Publications
Access hundreds of Bay Program publications, from scientific reports to factsheets to memorandums.
Recently Added
2017 Fish Habitat Outcome SRS Narrative
A summary of the Fish Habitat outcome created for the May 2017 Quarterly Progress meeting.
View details2017 Brook Trout Outcome SRS Summary
A summary of the Brook Trout outcome created for the May 2017 Quarterly Progress meeting.
View details2017 Stream Health Outcome SRS Summary
A summary of the Stream Health outcome created for the May 2017 Quarterly Progress meeting.
View details2017 Protected Lands Outcome SRS Narrative
A summary of the Protected Lands outcome created for the May 2017 Quarterly Progress meeting.
View details2017 Healthy Watersheds Outcome Narrative
A summary of the Healthy Watersheds outcome created for the May 2017 Quarterly Progress meeting.
View detailsHealthy and Unhealthy Freshwater Ecosystems Graphic
This graphic was created to help explain the differences between ecosystems in healthy and unhealthy upstream waterways. Below is a draft narrative to help you use this graphic to communicate with your stakeholders.
Narrative of the Healthy/Unhealthy Freshwater Ecosystems
This graphic shows both a healthy and an unhealthy fresh water stream that could appear in the headwaters of the Chesapeake Bay watershed. The graphic includes species that are characteristic of both healthy and unhealthy fresh water streams. It shows how an upstream waterway can use best management and conservation practices (e.g., planting forest buffers and installing green infrastructure) positively affect aquatic habitats and provide clean water to the Bay. The graphic also demonstrates how the lack of conservation practices and increased pollution can negatively affect a waterway. This two-sided graphic is applicable to all upstream jurisdictions (New York, Pennsylvania and West Virginia) in the Bay watershed.
The left, “healthy” side of the graphic shows several macroinvertebrates, fish, birds, insects and vegetation that are indicative of a healthy freshwater system. Species shown are stonefly larva, caddisfly crayfish, devil crayfish, yellow lamp mussel, green floater mussel, muskrat, belted kingfisher, great blue heron, brown trout, striped bass, alewives, pumpkinseed fish, coontails, eelgrass, red maple tree, pine trees and paw paw tree. The left side of the graphic also demonstrates a long riparian buffer along the length of the stream and a dense forested buffer between the farm and the stream. In addition, a healthy red maple root system and a living shoreline[1] are visible between the farm and waterway.
The right, “unhealthy” side of the graphic shows a murky, “dirty” freshwater system filled with nutrients, sediment, leaves, trash and sickly vegetation. In addition, dead creature, invasive species and pollution-tolerant organisms such as bloodworm midge larvae, red midge larvae, midge larvae, black fly larvae, pouch snails, red swamp crayfish and aquatic worms are evident. The land area draining into the unhealthy side includes numerous impervious surfaces, a tall stack that is dispersing airborne pollutants, eroding shorelines, brownish grass, a pipe discharging polluted water directly to the waterway and garbage on the stream bank. In addition, there is minimal living vegetation, an algal bloom blocking sunlight, no forested buffers and no living shoreline.
[1] Living shorelines are a green infrastructure technique using native vegetation alone or in combination with offshore sills to stabilize the shoreline. They provide a natural alternative to “hard” shoreline stabilization methods like stone sills or bulkheads, and provide benefits including nutrient pollution remediation, essential fish habitat provision and buffering of shoreline from waves and storms.
View detailsFactors Influencing the Headwaters, Nontidal, Tidal, and Mainstem Fish Habitat Function
Final report from the STAC workshop held April 25-26, 2018 in Richmond, VA. The workshop’s objective was to identify the necessary information and analytical approaches needed to assess the condition and vulnerability of fish habitat in the Watershed.
View detailsLand Use Methods and Metrics Narrative Summary (2018-2019)
Narrative that outlines the current understanding of the management approach toward the Land Use Methods and Metrics Outcome up until 2018, challenges, recommended adaptations and asks of the Management Board. Presented at the November 15, 2018 Quarterly Progress Management Board Meeting.
View detailsLand Use Methods and Metrics Presentation (2018-2019)
This presentation was given to the Management Board on November 15, 2018 about the progess made so far in meeting the Land Use Metrics and Methods Outcome, challenges facing the workgroup tasked with this outcome and requests of the Management Board.
View details[Draft] Stream Health Workplan
Workplan for the Stream Health Workgroup: 2018-2019; Draft pending Management Board approval.
View details